My view about the Moderators here

[sculpey]

I will not waste my time criticizing or insulting Mr. Dion Bozman as 1) he is unlikely to change, and 2) Dion probably revels in the letters of shock and repulsion that he regularly receives. Instead, I will focus on his hideous diatribes, which, after all, are the things that deny the obvious. As this letter will make clear, he is extraordinarily brazen. We've all known that for a long time. However, Dion's willingness to devastate vast acres of precious farmland sets a new world record for brazenness. True, those who rip apart causes that others feel strongly about do us all a great injustice, but he has been known to say that granting him complete control over our lives is as important as breathing air. That notion is so noxious, I hardly know where to begin refuting it. Dion spouts a lot of numbers whenever he wants to make a point. He then subjectively interprets those numbers to support his intimations while ignoring the fact that his dissertations are not witty satire, as Dion would have you believe. They're simply the disloyal ramblings of someone who has no idea or appreciation of what he's mocking. It's not necessary to go into too long of a description about how he plans to consign our traditional values to the rubbish heap of sesquipedalianism sooner than you think. Suffice it to say that he decries or dismisses capitalism, technology, industrialization, and systems of government borne of Enlightenment ideas about the dignity and freedom of human beings. These are the things that Dion fears, because they are wedded to individual initiative and responsibility.

I don't mean to imply that he is a supporter of everything that was trendy in America in the 1960s -- the marvelous effects of LSD and other psychedelic drugs, pyramid power, various oriental religious cults, transcendental meditation, UFOs and extraterrestrials, CIA conspiracies, you name it -- but it's true, nonetheless. He wants to condemn children to a life of drugs, gangs, drinking, rape, incest, verbal abuse, physical abuse, and a number of other horrors. What's wrong with that? What's wrong is Dion's gossamer grasp of reality. Do you really think that obscurity, evasiveness, incomprehensibility, indirectness, and ambiguity are marks of depth and brilliance, as Dion claims? Wake up! People often get the impression that unprofessional, loathsome mouthpieces for vulgar misoneism and Dion's lapdogs are separate entities. Not so. When one catches cold, the other sneezes. As proof, note that every time Dion utters or writes a statement that supports opportunism -- even indirectly -- it sends a message that Dion is a paragon of morality and wisdom. I claim we mustn't let him make such statements, partly because he is the root of all evil, but primarily because many people are shocked when I tell them that I find his attitudes superstitious, callous, benighted, and more than a little obtrusive. And I'm shocked that so many people are shocked. You see, I myself had thought everybody already knew that he has gotten away with so much for so long that he's lost all sense of caution, all sense of limits. If you think about it, only a man without any sense of limits could desire to torment, harry, and persecute anyone who crosses his path. In the beginning of this letter, I promised you details, but now I'm running out of space. So here's one detail to end with: Mr. Dion Bozman loves everybody so much, he wants to rip out the guts of everybody who doesn't love everybody as much as he does.

[Drau]

<u>Complaint #1</u>

Doesn't anyone get the point? It doesn't matter for squat that Vagina's flunkies are just as bad as Vagina is, if not worse. What's far more relevant is that in this crucial hour and under the treachery of our time, I must announce that Vagina turns her back on those who have been the most loyal to her. Before examining the present situation, however, it is important that I resolve a number of lingering problems. The bottom line is that unyielding rigidity is just as much a threat to the continuity of things as xenophobic revisionism.

<u>Complaint #2</u>

I am really at a loss for what to say in this letter, other than to convey my shock. There are a number of reasons Vagina isn't telling us as to why she wants to let down ladders which the unambitious, unforgiving, and unreasonable scramble to climb. In this letter, I will expose those reasons one-by-one, on the principle that the purpose of this letter is far greater than to prove to you how twisted and bleeding-heart she has become. The purpose of this letter is to get you to start thinking for yourself, to start thinking about how we have a dilemma of leviathan proportions on our hands: Should we avoid the extremes of a pessimistic naturalism and an optimistic humanism by combining the truths of both, or is it sufficient to subject her ultimata to the rigorous scrutiny they warrant? I mean, I once told her that she should feel ashamed of herself. How did she respond to that? She proceeded to curse me off using a number of colorful expletives not befitting this letter, which serves only to show that Vagina's toadies, when they are taken seriously at all, are considered by most scholars to be of questionable credibility. Do I blame society for this? No, I blame Vagina. To deny that compared to these morally crippled, disloyal blowhards, every pimp is a man of honor is blinkered nonsense and political irresponsibility. It is nonsense because Vagina embraces oligarchism with open arms. And it is irresponsible because Vagina claims that every word that leaves her mouth is teeming with useful information. I assert that the absurdities within that claim speak for themselves, although I should add that Vagina's claim that her smear tactics are Right with a capital R is not only an attack on the concept of objectivity, but an assault on the human mind. Statements like, "Favoritism, as a social philosophy, is subversive" accurately express the feelings of most of us here. Have you ever had a bad dream about Vagina trying to make today's oppressiveness look like grade-school work compared to what she has planned for the future? Well, I have news for you. That wasn't a dream; it was real. If we intend to defend democracy, we had best learn to recognize its primary enemy and not be afraid to stand up and call her by name. That name is Vagina.

<u>Complaint #3 (as an Organization)</u>

I realize that everyone is entitled to his opinion, and I respect this. I also hope that you will all respect mine as you read this letter. What follows is a set of observations I have made about soulless vigilantes. It may not seem to be very important right now, but if Vagina can one day incite young people to copulate early, often, and indiscriminately, then the long descent into night is sure to follow. [img]graemlins/thumbs_up.gif[/img] Vagina wants all of us to believe that things have never been better. That's why it sponsors brainwashing in the schools, brainwashing by the government, brainwashing statements made to us by politicians, entertainers, and sports stars, and brainwashing by the big advertisers and the news media. Vagina is obviously hiding something. [img]rolleyes.gif[/img] That is why, come what may, we must embrace diversity.

[Dajistano]

<u><font size="3"> Dear Unreal Board Members - RE: Dajistano</u></font>

As poorly qualified as I am to clarify and correct some of the inaccuracies present in Dajistano's ebullitions, I hope you will bear with me while I begin this sincere and earnest attempt. And please don't get mad with me if, in doing so, I must prevent the production of a new crop of drugged-out schizophrenics. By way of introduction, let me just say that if we are powerless to search for solutions that are more creative and constructive than the typically judgmental ones championed by dodgy profiteers, it is because we have allowed Dajistano to make people suspicious of those who speak the truth. Someone just showed me a memo supposedly written by Dajistano. The memo spells out his plans to relabel millions of people as "illogical". If this memo is authentic, it tells us that you shouldn't let Dajistano intimidate you. You shouldn't let him push you around. We're the ones who are right, not Dajistano. If you don't think that his Ponzi schemes are a masterpiece of vapid emotionalism, then you've missed the whole point of this letter. Contrary to the impression that the worst sorts of condescending beguilers there are offer "new," "innovative," and "advanced" ideas, there is little new in their morals.

Two quick comments: 1) Dajistano's slaves don't worry me, since they're generally not in positions to make significant decisions (except maybe "right shoe on right foot"), and 2) he thinks that he has achieved sainthood. However, it would be good for the press to start paying attention to things like this. Dajistano is trying to deflect attention from his randy, gutless obiter dicta. But it goes further than that; Dajistano wants to pull the levers of ruffianism and oil the gears of clericalism. Who does he think he is? I mean, I want to make this clear, so that those who do not understand deeper messages embedded within sarcastic irony -- and you know who I'm referring to -- can process my point. Something recently occurred to me that might occur to Dajistano, as well, if he would just turn down the volume of his voice for a moment: Some people are responsible and others are not. Dajistano falls into the category of "not". This is far from all I have to say on the topic, but it's certainly enough for now. Just remember one thing: Dajistano seems to have no trouble sweet-talking irritable, clumsy jackanapes into helping him deprive individuals of the right to comment on a phenomenon that has and will continue to generate an epidemic of corruption and social unrest.

<font color="#cd6600" size="1">[ June 01, 2005 06:28 PM: Message edited by: Dajistano? ]</font>

[316what]

Originally posted by 316what:
Mung should stop playing verbal games and tell us what it really means.

<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">My favorite part, lol.

[baimun]

What I am about to say is strictly off the record. On that understanding, I shall give you candidly and without circumlocution the best estimate of our present plight that I have been able to make. But before I continue, allow me to explain that it's because of Pres. George W. Bush's willingness to prevaricate and equivocate that he has no moral courage, nor even a desire to be honest and forthright. It's that simple. He likes to cite poll results that "prove" that human beings should be appraised by the number of things and the amount of money they possess instead of by their internal value and achievements. Really? Have you ever been contacted by one of his pollsters? Chances are good that you never have been contacted and never will be. Otherwise, the polls would show that you might say, "We are nearing a synthesis of demagogism and defeatism into a sinister solecism that will redefine unbridled self-indulgence as a virtue, as the ultimate test of personal freedom." Fine, I agree. But Pres. Bush insists that bad things "just happen" (i.e., they're not caused by Pres. Bush himself). This fraud, this lie, is just one among the thousands he perpetrates.

I'm not the first to mention that Pres. Bush favors a callow "Code of Conduct" that serves no purpose other than to cause one-sided vaporings to be entered into historical fact. If you doubt this, just ask around. We must worry about two classes of indecent social outcasts: stinking and rancorous. Pres. Bush is among the former. I'm not writing this letter for your entertainment. I'm not even writing it for your education. I'm writing it for our very survival. I hope I haven't bored you by writing an entire letter about Pres. George W. Bush. Still, this letter was the best way to explain to you that Pres. Bush's fairy tales are grounded in phony acts of kindness.

[img]tongue.gif[/img]